TBM Provides Versatility in Difficult Ground for Water Conveyance Tunnel in El Paso, TX

The following is a post from Akkerman. For more details and additional job site photos, visit their website.

BRH-Garver Construction LP, a Houston based civil construction contractor pipe jacked 885-linear feet of 66-inch ID Permalok® casing filled with 48-inch carrier lines to convey treated water from the Canal Water Treatment Plant (WTP) for El Paso Water in El Paso, TX. The project risks and rewards existed in equal measure for all stakeholders.

The Canal WTP, also known as the Robertson Umbenhauer, was constructed 75-years ago and is situated between the Rio Grande River and a 100-year old BNSF rail yard. The new transmission lines culminate to tie in at San Antonio Avenue in downtown El Paso.

The water lines on the Canal Water Treatment Plant Discharge Main Tunnel project traveled under Highway I-85, and 18 BNSF rail yard tracks in soft ground conditions presenting many opportunities for settlement. El Paso’s water table is prone to seasonal variability due to its proximity to the river, and the likelihood of contaminated ground, existing utilities and obstructions in the 100-year old rail yard posed a potential threat to tunneling personnel and loss of production. Since the launch shaft was in an active BNSF rail yard, frequent and diligent communication and coordination with the railroad personnel transpired for safety, and equipment and material staging.

Several factors contributed to project cost savings including the use of a more cost-effective Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) system over a microtunneling system, a value-engineered design to initiate both bores from one launch shaft inside the rail yard to emerge into one reception shaft, the downsizing of casing diameter from 72 to 66-inch, and the avoidance of deep well dewatering, which also reduced settlement risk.

The contractor’s pipe jacking experience informed the resolution of the project’s more difficult challenges when completing the 570- and 315-linear foot tunnels. When unforeseen cobbles were discovered, the hydraulic doors on the TBM cutter head provided passage for the cobbles with minimal loss of production. When unpredicted boulders were discovered, although (continued)tunneling had to pause to allow chemical grout to be used to stabilize the bore, the hydraulic doors provided essential access for breaking the boulders to a size that allowed for their passage to successfully complete the tunnel. When the crew ran into unanticipated PPCA ground conditions, the crew persevered by using a full-face mask filtration system to resume mining operations.

The project was deemed successful, and the TBM named “Robbie” in honor of the 75th anniversary of the Robertson Umbenhauer WTP, proved to be the right method.

  1. Breff Cooling of BRH Garver, comments on the equipment selection, “The versatility of the Akkerman TBM with hydraulically-operated doors, gave us some options that a MTBM would not have. A slurry machine may have been the preferred choice under critically located structures in ground that varies from clay, to sand seams, to running gravels. However, the small but real possibility of boulders, or steel fish plates and other obstructing debris sometimes found under rail yards, tipped the balance towards selecting a manned-entry TBM for accessing any obstructions. With the benefit of hindsight, we can say that the TBM turned out to be the better choice in this case because we ended up discovering unforeseen boulders.”

Cooling also credits the railway stating, “We are grateful for the exceptional cooperation from BNSF for accommodating our field operations inside their busy 24-hour around-the-clock rail yard operations.”

The Canal Water Treatment Plant Discharge Main Tunnel project was designed by a partnership between CDM Smith and Parkhill, Smith & Cooper who also provided site supervision and contract administration. Tunneling technical support, oversight and settlement monitoring was performed by Killduff Underground Engineering.

Cooling concludes, “This is the third time BRH-Garver has partnered with an engineering firm for a design-build project, and the first for time for a tunneling project. The partnership accepted transfer of nearly all risk for the client and proved very effective for BRH to apply three decades of tunneling experience towards the optimum tunneling solution for the design changes. Our preference would be for this type of project delivery all of the time.”

UMASS Lowell Student Chapter Represents at Annual Event

Recently the NASTT Student Chapter at UMASS Lowell participated in the school’s annual campus club recruiting event. They had a table at the event outlining what the student chapter does and why trenchless matters. These students are passionate about growing interest in the trenchless industry!

NASTT volunteer instructor and “Trenchless Guru” (yep, that’s his X handle!), Dennis Doherty, is very involved with the students at UMASS Lowell and volunteers his time to mentor these future trenchless champions. Dennis is the National Practice Leader of Trenchless Technologies at Haley & Aldrich. Dennis said, “Get involved with our students. They are our future”. We couldn’t agree more!

7 Lessons Learned from Estimating Mistakes on Sewer Bypass Projects

The following is a guest post from Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.

When contractors provide estimates that include a sewer bypass, accuracy is essential—each project is unique, and accounting for these nuances is critical to maintaining margins. Failure to plan on the front end may lead to an influx of change orders and a big hit to the bottom line. Damages could go further than money alone: An estimating mistake might lead to a sanitary sewer overflow (SSO). Following an SSO, you can expect large sums for cleanup and DEQ penalties, along with negative PR and a ripple effect that could impact future projects.

Before submitting a bid, it’s critical to cover all the bases and avert potential problems on the job. The following lessons learned can help contractors avoid estimating mistakes, win bids, and complete projects at a profit—and without visits from the DEQ.

Lesson 1: Take a bottom-up approach to estimating.

Often estimators have little choice but to use unit costs, like cost per foot of pipe, for an estimate. But that doesn’t eliminate the need to check the latest prices. Inserting the cost from the last project without checking it seldom produces a safe number. Even if a job appears to be the same size and complexity as a previous project, treat every job individually and get a current price for every item.

Lesson 2: Always visit the project site with a knowledgeable individual.

Unforeseen site conditions are the largest contributor to project change orders and increased costs. Plans and drawings alone do not provide the information needed to route pipe, situate pumps, and manage flow for a sewer bypass. Avoiding this mistake is easy: Always visit the site with the engineer or a representative from the municipality—whoever has the most in-depth knowledge of the project. The sewer bypass subcontractor should also attend to explain the capabilities, as well as the limitations, of the pumping system. Consulting with the entire team will help ensure a solid quote for that portion of the contract.

Lesson 3: Insist on backup detail for subcontractor quotes.

Contracting firms often use subcontractors to design a sewer bypass for a larger project. Even if the subcontractor has complete confidence in the system as designed, never take their word that it will handle the sewer bypass flow for the cost they plan to charge. Instead, request the engineering calculations and system drawings, and then ask the design engineer to review them. Based on the information the subcontractor provides, the scope of equipment, system layout, and performance should be clear.

Lesson 4: Do due diligence on labor costs.

Labor costs often comprise the largest portion of a sewer bypass budget. Costs for prevailing wage and certified payroll add up quickly. Different project conditions can impact labor costs significantly, even for the same task. For example, a team working on a city street with heavy traffic may install less bypass piping each day than one working in an open field. Therefore, it’s critical to examine labor costs in detail over the project timeline, including hours and types of labor for each task. Then, make sure your bypass subcontractor offers a firm commitment on the cost.

Lesson 5: Factor in risk and the potential for lost revenue when accepting a low bid.

Although selecting the subcontractor with the lowest bid can be tempting, ultimately the project may cost more. Never assume a subcontractor will take responsibility for problems that result from lack of experience or expertise. Instead, consider all the worst-case scenarios that could occur, such as a sanitary sewer overflow. Ensure the subcontractor can manage each and every problem that may arise. Double check contract limitations and exclusions, the safety plan, and the spill and emergency response plan. In addition to liability considerations, it’s critical to review a bypass subcontractor’s bid to ensure it is complete. Have they included enough in labor costs to complete the project? Are fuel costs included, or even tax? Low bids may leave out these important components which can result in lost profits.

Lesson 6: Review the engineering submittal with the subcontractor.

To ensure all the estimate information is correct, always review the engineering submittal against the specifications with the subcontractor to make sure it matches the information in the request for quote. As a best practice, the engineering submittal should include not only the information required within the specifications, but also all the pertinent details about the temporary pumping system. It should be clear and concise so anyone who reads it will fully understand how the system is designed, set up, and operated. It should also have all the supporting documentation such as fluid calculations, drawings, and specification sheets on the equipment being used.

Checking the engineering submittal against the specifications will help to reduce or eliminate the engineer sending the submittal back for changes. Until the submittal is approved, the job cannot go forward, so in order to keep the project on track, it’s important to cross-check the documents before sending to the engineer.

Lesson 7: Assume the cost quoted can never be modified.

Do not count on subcontractors to take responsibility for problems and resolve them in a timely manner. The contractor is ultimately on the line and will be held to the amount put in every box on every bid. To be competitive, a firm’s margins must remain as low as possible while still providing a profit. If a quote does not include every item down to the last fitting and bolt, the margin and profit will suffer. The bypass subcontractor and firm should work together to determine the right costs to put into the bid tabulation sheet. Also, to avoid being buried in unanticipated invoices, be certain to incorporate a billing schedule with the bypass subcontractor that indicates when invoices will be received and what they are for.

Abiding by these seven lessons learned should avert many potential problems that occur in sewer bypass and ensure a winning bid that leads to a profitable and successful project.

For more information, visit www.sunbeltrentals.com or call 800-736-2504.

Small Robbins Double Shield Makes a Monumental Achievement

Compact TBM bores longest Rock Tunnel at 2.46 m Diameter

In August 2019, a small diameter Double Shield TBM made a big impact. The 2.46 m (8.07 ft) diameter Robbins machine completed 3,475 m (11,400 ft) of boring with no intermediate access, making it the longest rock tunnel ever bored by a Double Shield TBM under 2.5 m (8.2 ft) in diameter.

The machine completed the Parmer Lane Wastewater Interceptor in Austin, Texas, USA for contractor S.J. Louis Construction. Despite obstacles including two tight curves of 150 m (500 ft) radius and unexpected ground conditions that required modification of the cutterhead in the tunnel, advance rates were good. The machine reached up to 380 m (1,250 ft) per month while mining in single 12-hour shifts per day. “It was a hard rock TBM, and it performed better than expected through hard rock,” said Zach West, Project Manager for S.J. Louis.

The challenges for the TBM and its crew were varied, explained West. “The pairing of this tunnel length, which is on the longer side, and the diameter, which is on the smaller side, is challenging.  The survey in a small tunnel with tight radius curves and limited surface access for over two miles is very difficult.” He added that the shallow tunnel depth, and the alignment to within a few feet of sanitary lines, high-pressure gas mains, and fuel tanks for gas stations, made TBM guidance critical.  “I would say that I am most proud of our ability to guide the machine successfully through these obstacles and into our retrieval shaft within our expected tolerances.”

Through one stretch, the tunnel advanced directly between a 30 cm (12 in) diameter, high-pressure gas main and fuel tanks for a gas station with limited as-built information.  “Navigating this section took a great deal of coordination with the local utility companies.  Because the tunnel diameter was too small for an automated guidance system, we manually surveyed the front of the machine at every push to ensure the machine was on track,” said West.

“I’m proud that they mined the longest tunnel to date for a small shielded gripper machine of this size without any safety issues.  Kudos to their management philosophy and jobsite team,” said Tom Fuerst, Robbins Utility Tunneling Sales Manager. Robbins assisted the crew while in the tight 150 m (500 ft) curves and helped with modifications required to the cutterhead and disc cutter arrangement.

The tunnel is located in an environmentally sensitive aquifer, with ground conditions ranging from soft dolomite with clay to limestone from 13 to 68 MPa (2,000 to 10,000 psi) UCS.   “While we tunneled through the softer material, our best advance rate was close to 0.9 m (3 ft) per hour.  When we tunneled through the expected limestone, advance rates were over 5.2 m (17 ft) per hour.  Our best day was 25 m (81 ft) in a single shift,” said West.

The majority of the tunnel used a simple two-rock-bolt pattern for support.  In the last 10% of the tunnel, ribs and lagging were used as support. Final carrier pipe, which is now being installed, consists of 110 cm (42 in) diameter fiberglass pipe.

The successful project is part of a larger trend towards small diameter, TBM-driven rock tunnels in the United States, says Fuerst. “It is primarily due to demographics and business growth.  The parts of the USA that are growing need to build out their sewer and water infrastructure. TBMs can mine long distances with tight curves.  They can reduce the need for multiple shafts, which lowers the overall project cost.  And, given that most small diameter pipelines follow a road or municipal right-of-way, traffic problems are reduced significantly compared with open cut operations.”

The Parmer Lane Wastewater Interceptor connects to two existing lift stations at Lake Creek and Rattan Creek.  The tunnel allows for these lift stations to be decommissioned, and will provide additional flow capacity by gravity, reducing operating costs for the City of Austin.

Image 1: Completed in August 2019 with a Robbins Double Shield TBM, the Parmer Lane Wastewater Interceptor will provide additional flow capacity via gravity in Austin, Texas, USA.
Image 2: The 3,475 m (11,400 ft) tunnel bored by a Robbins TBM is the longest ever bored by a Double Shield machine under 2.5 m (8.2 ft) in diameter.
Image 3: The S.J. Louis Construction crew celebrate the successful and safe completion of the Parmer Lane Wastewater Interceptor with a Robbins TBM.
Image 4: Tom Fuerst, Robbins Utility Tunneling Sales Manager, celebrates as he exits the TBM during its August 2019 breakthrough in Austin, Texas, USA.
Image 5: The Robbins TBM bored through dolomite with clay and limestone at rates of up to 380 m (1,250 ft) in one month while mining in single 12-hour shifts per day.

Scholarships Available for Municipal & Public Utilities for the NASTT 2020 No-Dig Show

The North American Society for Trenchless Technology (NASTT) — the leading association serving and promoting the North American trenchless industry — is pleased to announce municipal and public utility scholarship opportunities to attend the NASTT 20202 No-Dig Show, April 5-9 in Denver, Colorado.

In 2013, NASTT established the No-Dig Show Municipal & Public Utility Scholarship Award Program to provide education and training for employees of North American municipalities, government agencies and utility owners who have limitedor no training funds due to economic challenges. In past years, over 100 applicants were awarded the scholarship annually.

“The NASTT Municipal & Public Utility Scholarship offers public agencies the opportunity in which to participate and experience the world of trenchless. Since its inception in 2013, scholarships have been awarded to more than 850 applicants, and the success of the program continues to increase every year.” said Joe Lane, 2020 No-Dig Show Program Chair and V.P. of International Operations for Insituform. “With an entire show dedicated to trenchless technology, this scholarship is a tremendous opportunity for municipal & public utility employees to attend at little or no cost.”

Selected scholarship winners will be awarded Full Conference and Exhibition registration to the NASTT 2020 No-Dig Show. Also available are one day conference registrations which include full access to all exhibits and technical paper sessions. Selected applicants will also be eligible to receive complimentary overnight accommodations for three nights at the host hotel. The scholarship applications are reviewed by a committee of NASTT volunteers and awarded based upon the supplied responses.

To apply for the scholarship, complete the application online at

nastt.org/no-dig-show/municipal-scholarships on or before November 1, 2019. Applicants are not required to be NASTT members.

NASTT’s Municipal & Public Utility Scholarships program is sponsored by Benjamin Media, Inc, award-winning publisher of the leading underground construction magazine, Trenchless Technology.

For more information about NASTT’s No-Dig Show visit www.nodigshow.com, email conferences@benjaminmedia.com or call 330-467-7588.